|
|
|
|
|
Climb the Mountain Speech
& Debate Foundation Climb the Mountain
provides support for coaches, students, and judges to build a bigger and even
better speech and debate community. |
Judging
Public Forum Debate Step
4: An Example Public Forum Debate Print Style Ballot
Note
that: 1. Even
though the teams are Pro and Con, some ballots still use Affirmative (pro)
and Negative (con). 2. Judge
circled the winning team. 3. Judge
gave each debater speaker points (26 to 28) based on how well the judge
thought each debater did in the debate. Note:
At the Seattle U Tournaments, you are expected to score on a 24.1 to 29.9
scale. 24.1
needs serious improvement (eg the debater spoke for
30 seconds; the debater supported opponent’s case; debater was rude, etc) 25.2
needs major improvement 26.3
fair debater, needs significant improvement 27.4
okay/decent debater, needs some improvement 28.5
good debater, needs small improvements 29.6
amazing debater, fantastic in almost every way 29.9
top debater you will judge this entire year 4. Judge
gave comments and reason for decision (RFD). At
Seattle U—you give comments and reason for decision AFTER you
email your ballot with who won and speaker points and AFTER you speak with
the students giving them feedback. |
|
|
|
|
|
